Showing posts with label LGBTQ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBTQ. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 July 2020

Best Films of the 2010s: Moonlight

Lists are beautiful. Films are beautiful. Opinions are subjective. Some films that we see now- some made for kids, some made in other languages, some made in 'trashy' genres- will one day become classics. Which ones? Here's my entirely subjective gaze into the crystal ball with my picks of the best films of the 2010s...

Moonlight

  

Moonlight is a film that is excellent in every aspect, emotional and smart in equal measure. It follows the coming of age of a young boy named Chiron, who is fundamentally disadvantaged growing up in America by his race, class and sexuality. Chiron’s story is split into three segments and in each the character is played by a different actor (Alex Hibbert, Ashton Sanders and Treyvante Rhodes). These sections are delineated by the names and corresponding identities he is afforded: Little, Chiron and Black. We might think of these as boy, adolescent and man. These identities are, of course, not self-contained but bleed into and overlay one another. Chiron gets called Little in the middle section and Black in the second section, for instance.

    The film does not preach to its viewers, but immerses them as surely as young Chiron’s surrogate father Juan (Mahershala Ali) tilts and rocks him in the surging ocean, teaching him how to swim. The three sections are patterned by liberating, almost epiphanic moments at the local beach and recurring, awkward encounters with a contemporary named Kevin who seems to offer a safe outlet for Chiron’s burgeoning sexuality. Director Barry Jenkins regularly uses the unusual and immersive technique of having characters conversing while looking straight into the camera lens, in close up. This implicates and involves the audience in the relationships on screen, breaking up the main flow of the story with something akin to visceral photographs.

        For all the raw power and immaculate structure of the script, this film is turbocharged by its all-star ensemble cast. Naomie Harris shows her full quality as Chiron’s mother, struggling with addiction and an inner wildness that often scares her son. Mahershala Ali is a quiet but powerful presence early on, but for me Andre Harris as the eldest iteration of Kevin steals the show. He has found his feet as a diner chef and, though troubled, has never lost his teasing humour or warmth. When he calls up Chiron after ten years of separation, he proves how powerfully love and care can be expressed just in cooking a meal for someone.

    This culinary compassion is something Kevin shares with Janelle Monae’s Teresa. I am high-key obsessed with Janelle Monae’s role in this film as surrogate mother Teresa, who is always ready to tease Chiron into talk with a glass of orange juice, a slap-up meal and her sardonic, warm eyes. Her album Dirty Computer soundtracked my own process of coming out to myself, so when she says ‘it’s all love and all pride in this house’ my breath hitches every time.

     These hugely talented, experienced artists orbit around the three Chirons at the centre of the piece; young Alex Hibbert, eyes so wide they almost pop from his skull; Ashton Sanders, gangly, eyes all skittish anxiety; and Treyvante Rhodes, outwardly macho, eyes too weary to be fully sad anymore.

     I have seen several reviewers who consider the transition between the scrawny Sanders and the bulked-up Rhodes implausible and to the film's detriment. The size disparity is shocking, but thoroughly intentional and Kevin comments on this upon his reunion with Chiron, openly stating, ‘this is not what I expected’. The change rings true to me. Many people do emerge bulked up after prison time because there is little to do there other than work out. I’m lucky due to racial and socioeconomic privilege to have never been close to prison and the sort of radical rethinking of one’s identity incarceration can force. Yet I do know that as a boy, not yet able to articulate that I was probably gay, the first time in life I felt safe from bullies was when I started to fill out and got good at rugby. The physical discrepancy between Rhodes and Sanders makes perfect sense, and Treyvante Rhodes delivers a note-perfect performance in the final section. He says that I ‘built myself from the ground up. Built myself hard’, but the film reveals that identity constructed from a place of fear is always built on shaky ground. Rhodes conveys with many a look that physical growth belies a shivering, shrivelling spirit.

     This film portrays modern, and specifically African American, masculinity like no other and that is why when I watch it, like Chiron, ‘I cry so much sometimes I might turn to drops’. It contains radiant moments that will hit viewers in ways that are hard to articulate. For instance, there is the point in the second section when Ashton Sanders’ hands splay on the beach in a moment of post-coital relief. ‘Sand angels’, I think, every time.

 

That concludes my list of the best films of the 2010s! If you've stuck with me all the way I'm slightly amazed and please do comment your own favourites if you like:)


Monday, 20 July 2020

Book Review: The Vegetarian by Han Kang and Her Body & Other Parties by Carmen Maria Machado.


     Carmen Maria Machado’s Her Body & Other Parties (2017) is a delicious short story collection which mashes up sci-fi and horror conceits with intersectional feminist thought. Machado can WRITE, her particular strengths being the depiction of appetites (for food or for sex) and the creation of lush atmospheres. Machado uses fiction to explore female desire and the plurality of womanhood, like imperial-phase Angela Carter refracted through queer perspectives. Machado avoids a feeling I often have with short story collections that the constant shifting of characters, premises and narrative forms stops any single story making a deep impression: a couple of the characters and their situations do stand out.

     Among these is the opening tale, ‘The Husband Stitch’. We follow a young woman who makes out with a boy, marries him and has a child with him: so far so conventional. But there is a difference. The woman has a green ribbon on her neck which is part of her body; other women in this world seem to have similar ribbons in various places. The man wants to touch and probe his wife’s ribbon because ‘a wife should have no secrets from her husband’. Yet the protagonist says, ‘the ribbon is not a secret; it’s just mine’. The man becomes more tantalised and more pressing as the story develops, leading the woman to reflect: ‘He is not a bad man at all. To describe him as evil or wicked or corrupted would do a deep disservice to him. And yet –’. Men can be blatantly shitty, but they can also be shitty in entitled,  insidious and subtly forceful ways.

     Machado suggests that a long-lasting marriage does not mean complete knowledge of the other person: private selves remain intact. The idea of ‘two becoming one’ is a myth and sometimes a damaging one. This is not an entirely new concept; it is treated for instance in James Joyce’s famous short story ‘The Dead’. But Machado formulates a particularly male and particularly possessive desire to know. Knowledge, after all, is power. The almost fairy-tale premise of the ribbons allows some female private self or core of individuality to be physicalised and considered in new ways. Similarly, in the world of ‘Real Women Have Bodies’ an affliction strikes only women where their bodies, at different points in life but inescapably, fade away into translucency, transparency and finally total incorporeality. These women then must go about weaving themselves into the fabric of dresses in lament or disrupting voting machines in protest.

     ‘Eight Bites’ is a great story about what it’s like to live in a body that is all too corporeal. It focusses on a woman whose sisters have all had a procedure that gives them the perfect body so long as they apparently never eat more than miniscule amounts ever again. She must decide whether to undergo the process herself whilst navigating the disapproval of her daughter who is more traditionally feminist and for whom body acceptance is the only acceptable way of thinking. At one point the protagonist says:

 ‘I was tired of looking into the mirror and grabbing the things that I hated and lifting them, clawing deep, and then letting them drop and everything aching.’

 I have not seen this written enough. For many of us our bodies are a source of self-loathing. Body positivity should absolutely be encouraged, but I don’t think it’s un-feminist to want to change your body. It’s un-feminist to not understand why women in particular might want that.

 

    One slight flaw in Machado’s collection for me is that some of the protagonists seem undifferentiated: a chorus rather than solo voices that come together. The worlds of the stories are differentiated but I can still always detect the presence of an author with specific concerns who is perhaps trying to use characters as vehicles for these concerns. That’s fine- Machado is an entertaining and often pleasurable companion, whose interests overlap with my own. But Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian (translated from South Korean by Deborah Smith) achieves something that only a select few of my favourite books do, where I struggle to imagine how anyone could possibly have written it. It seems like something someone dug up or found lurking under their bed, whilst focussing on similar themes to Machado’s collection: female bodies, appetites and protests.

     Kang’s novel may be called The Vegetarian. But, Reader, the eponymous herbivore, Yeong-hye, has not been inspired by Greta Thunberg or a lusciously voiced David Attenborough documentary. No. Yeong-hye is a housewife in an affluent part of Seoul, her husband noting her ‘passive personality’ and excellent cooking. One day, however, she throws out all the meat in their house. She will go on to eat less and less (for reasons I will not spoil). As she detaches herself from a culture that gives prime place to meat-eating and her body begins to first slim down and then waste away, her husband accuses her of being ‘self-centred’- of acting ‘selfishly’ and with excessive ‘self-possession’. She is merely doing what he has always done, but like the husband in Machado’s ‘The Husband Stitch’, the husband here cannot accept that she has a private self inaccessible to him. Female independence is immediately pathologized even before Yeong-hye’s weird dreams take deeper root in her psyche:

 ‘Dark woods. No people. The sharp-pointed leaves on the trees, my torn feet. This place, almost remembered, but I’m lost now. Frightened. Cold.’

 As in this example, chilling impressionistic snapshots of Yeong-hye’s dreams are embedded in indented type into the more ordered main narrative style. These moments are the only direct access the reader receives to Yeong-hye’s psyche, and even they are elliptical and fleeting. Elsewhere the novel’s tripartite structure offers us views of Yeong-hye from the outside- the perspectives of her aggressively average and self-absorbed husband, of her brother-in-law who definitely isn’t just a creepy perv because artists are special, right?

     Lastly we get her sister’s take, for whom Yeong-hye is a figure of equal parts terror, bemusement and inspiration. Yeong-hye’s sole focus on her relationship with herself and her body reveals the fact that In-hye’s identities are primarily relational- she thinks ‘as a daughter, as an older sister, as a wife and as a mother’ and ‘her life had never belonged to her’. Her sister’s ‘magnificent irresponsibility’ provokes admiration and disapproval in equal measure, and the complex development of their sororal bond is at the heart of the narrative’s ending.

 

     As with Machado’s collection Her Body & Other Parties, the power of Kang’s narrative is that there is no direct, on-the-nose allegory- you cannot uncontestably state that in ‘The Husband Stitch’ ‘the ribbon is her private identity’, or that in The Vegetarian ‘Yeong-hye’s vegetarianism is a feminist protest’. Though they do seem to contain these meanings, leaving things implied allows for a symbolic resonance murky and powerful. What is clear is that female bodies, with all their protuberances or diminishments, sticking out or wasting away, are the centre of desire, shame and even protest; sci-fi and horror conventions are a potent prism through which to write these experiences.


Best Films of the 2010s: Call Me by Your Name

Lists are beautiful. Films are beautiful. Opinions are subjective. Some films that we see now- some made for kids, some made in other languages, some made in 'trashy' genres- will one day become classics. Which ones? Here's my entirely subjective gaze into the crystal ball with my picks of the best films of the 2010s...

Call Me By Your Name

  
 
Could there be a more perfect combination of elements than Italy, Sufjan Stevens music, classical statuary, Arnie Hammer and Timothy Chalamet? This film dances (like a dad of course) on the fine line between artful and pretentious. The story is intended to make us as viewers fall in love with its lounging, lazy middle-class aesthetic- reclining by the pool is only interrupted by trilingual conversations-  as much as the characters and their emotions. In adapting his source material, though, director Luca Guadagnino makes one excellent decision after another, scrapping a wanky poetry reading from the book and giving characters that aren’t Elio more of a 3D reality outside of his intense perspective. Chalamet’s Elio is elfin and half-formed, seething too much inside to be graceful. He makes expansive movements that still have a awkward, jerky quality. For all his intelligence he is simple: an open book, who handily even writes his thoughts down on Post-it notes and abortive messages to Oliver. Oliver on the other hand is elusive. The whole film is an exercise in trying to know Oliver. Hammer outwardly is statuesque and placid but this is the result of his character’s inner walls and barriers (the screenplay hints at a repressive upbringing in the US). The moments of freedom he allows himself with Elio seem to spark a boyish joy in him, despite the undertow of fear.

    Some things are oft-mentioned when discussing this film, for instance, the brave ending of Chalamet staring into the fire. The score, too, is remarkable, and so much more than Sufjan (though this is peak, sensitive, plinky plinky Sufjan). I challenge you not to have Hallelujah Junction and Love My Way in your head for days after watching this. It is testament to the film’s greatness, though, that every rewatch draws out new details. Here are some that leap out at me. Elio is reading Heart of Darkness just before the famous peach moment (a seminal moment in the films of the decade, in every sense) , a ridiculous contrast that speaks so well to melodramatic teenage emotions. The first plangent chords of Sufjan’s Visions of Gideon,  which finishes the movie, play even the first time Elio enters Oliver’s room to make love; the film always has one eye on the end. Like the opening crawl of the Imperial Star Destroyer in A New Hope, the camera makes the train on which Oliver eventually departs seem to extend forever. 

    I can talk about the objective qualities of this film forever but for me (like any other honest critic) those are only part of the story. Imagine watching such a beautiful gay romance unfold while attending a secondary school where gay is a joke word. Imagine watching the scene where Elio’s father talks to him about love with your own father, at the end of a year when your parents’ divorce has uprooted your home life. The truthfulness of this film has meant that people see themselves there. Some have argued that this is the 'straight people's gay film' because in the scene where gay sex takes place the camera pans away (to a tree, and not even the sexiest of trees). But as an LGBTQ person I never saw it this way. Most of the physical romantic interaction in the film is portrayed as charming but clunkily awkward. This pan away allows the viewer's own imagination to supply a metaphysical perfection that physical reality cannot attain. And in a film that has been used to sell countless holidays, here is something not being marketed.

Next Time: less piano, more fire-spewing electric guitar.

Glasses in Films

     I have an early memory of Velma in Scooby Doo repeating gormlessly, ‘Where are my glasses? I can’t see without my glasses.’ Glasses are...